PROJECT DETAILS:
LOCATION: RALEIGH, NC
WHEN: 2018-2021
TYPE OF WORK: PROFESSIONAL
ROLE: DESIGNER
LANDSCAPE TEAM: CHARLES BRADLEY, RACHEL STEVENS
CLIENT: HERITAGE PROPERTIES
DESIGN PHASE: DD-CD-CA
CONSULTANT TEAM: GENSLER, MCADAMS
AWARDS: 2022 NC ASLA MERIT AWARD
My role on this project consisted of taking the previously established schematic design concept through design development and into construction documentation. This was my first deep dive into custom construction documentation. I worked closely with the project manager, Rachel Stevens on this. The schematic design featured various fluid-shaped hardscape elements, such as curbs, seatwalls and planter edges. Precast concrete was the chosen material for these flowing landscape elements and my task was to model these elements in Rhino 3D while taking into consideration the site’s topography and the joints and transitions between different materials.
To the left I have included some axonometric views that were created using the rhino model, below each axonometric drawing is a similar view of the real site. The main purpose of these axons were to illustrate the intended spatial relationships between materials.
I modeled the proposed design using a plan drawing and some generic precast seat wall section details that were available in the office. In Rhino 3D, I could easily construct an oblique 30’ long, 3’ wide 18” tall block with rounded edges, but, having chosen precast concrete as our construction material, that wasn’t how things were going to work in reality.
MY ROLE ON THE PROJECT
This large urban courtyard is in the heart of downtown Raleigh, between the mixed-use buildings One Glenwood and Two Hillsborough. The outdoor space includes sculptural seating areas, a meandering corridor, and various planting pockets whose fluid forms are inspired by the site’s natural history as the headwater of a Rocky Bank Creek tributary.
PROJECT BRIEF
THOUGHTS ON MATERIALS AND DESIGN
The whole thing about precast concrete is that it is “pre” cast, meaning the concrete is poured and solidified elsewhere, in a highly controlled environment (that makes it easier to achieve smooth, high-quality pieces of concrete in unusual geometries – what we were going for). The downside of precast is that you then must transport the concrete pieces to your site and install them there. Transporting a large precast block is logistically challenging and expensive, installing a large precast block is as well.
This meant that we needed to break down the precast elements into segments, or smaller precast pieces. This posed another financial challenge, because the more unique pieces we had, the more expensive the design was. Each unique precast piece needed a unique mold to form it. The more molds we needed, the more expensive our project was. If we could find ways to repeat precast pieces within the design, we could use the same mold more than once and the project would be less expensive.
However, the fluid SD design was highly irregular and the changing topography on site meant that even if in plan view the shapes were the same, they had different heights or were interfacing different materials that made it hard to repeat the same piece. This taught me that designing with modular elements from the beginning would have been a great way of saving money, time, and effort further along in the design process. We tried to redesign our site to make it much more modular, but that posed a lot of new layout changes and challenges that would have a ripple effect throughout the design work we had already done. Besides, the client loved the way the SD layout looked and was willing to spend more on unique precast pieces. We decided to find another way to make the project cheaper.
Originally, we had envisioned the precast pieces as solid precast blocks, but during the value engineering process, we found that we could use precast concrete caps instead. Underneath the precast concrete caps, we’d have cast-in-place (CIP) concrete foundations which were a lot cheaper. We moved forward with this solution. To the left you can see the evolution of the precast concrete details before value engineering (as solid blocks) and into caps atop CIP concrete in the final version. Below you can also see the unique precast wall pieces that were dimensioned in plan view as part of the final drawing set.
PAVING PATTERN
Another fun part of the design for Block 83 I was involved in is the paving pattern. During schematic design a three-tone ombré pavement pattern evocative a meandering riverbed was suggested. The challenge was determining what pavement material could be used to achieve this effect. We selected a hexagonal concrete unit paver that came in three different tones and developed a set of rules for a pavement pattern blend that achieved the desired outcome. Once the blending strategy was agreed upon, it was applied to the site. After an RFI during the construction administration phase, the tone of each paver was indicated in a detailed paving plan.
MODEL TO REALITY
MODEL TO REALITY